Review: Yesterday's Review: Patriots

What was that, right? Was there a purpose in posting that certain video? Did I just like that video? Why did I call it say it was for Patriots? Was it being ironic because it was french? Was it dadaism? Was it thought out at all? More, importantly, when will the blog go back to being normal?

To answer that last question and ignore the rest, the blog will go back to normal tomorrow. And to answer any lingering sentiment I suppose you may have: That post yesterday should've been called 'Review: Too Busy' as much as this post should be called 'Review: Rhetorical Questions' as much as you read this blog without a Facebook link. Anyway, video for laughing at:

Reviewing: Yesterday's review of the review of the day before that

We must understand that through these reviews, we can see how the author thinks of his audience. A short entry? C'mon I'vebeen better than that and it makes it seem like I don't enjoying talking/blogging. The real issue here is commitment. The more real issue hiding behind that mask of commitment is my own stuggles on how to talk to others. What do I want the reader to care about? I don't care. See! That's the problem. Sure, I am writing this for myself but to what extent? I already made this more reader friendly-- didn't I? The struggle is to look at yourself and truly allow yourself to be honest. You are kind of doing that. But that is still a kind of. Choose a side. No one needs to know anything about your long term goals, or anything about yourself. They just are here to read a blog entry. And this one isn't doing it as much as you would hope. But then again, it might be more than you hoped- sure it's a concept, and damned if you're struggling with it. Just keep pushing through. Spinning the wheel is what makes it mostly a wheel. Just don't too wrapped up in yourself. Yesterday's review was a slow ride, take it easy. There was no passion and no concern for yourself. Just an entry to be done. And that's a cop out. Don't pussy foot around, take things seriously. There are ways to be happy and it starts with me being serious about these entrys that aren't supposed to be serious. I'll enjoy it more. And quit confusing yourself and everyone else by changing tenses. That is really annoying. I know you were doing it on purpose to us. It's just that this is a review of another review about a review. You're going to lose your place. Now go out there, this entry is a stepping stone. Use it as light and the path shall be shown unto you. Hurry! This is the day.

Reviewing: Yesterday's Post

The thought process was there, but there weren't as many wheels turning as one would like. It was of the moment, sure- but didn't discuss much. This entry should discuss much more simply because it has that much more retrospect. 'A day more of retrospect' sounds like a decent high school band that won't ever materialize to anything. So basically- that entry tried. Which is what I got from re-reading it, you re-retard. Still, there needs to be more time with it. There is a point to make that if the posts continue like this- that first entry becomes the center of the onion behind the layers- but this isn't about the future of the entries (it actually is), but about yesterday's entry- which depends on the future (see?). So do I end this entry quick? It's not about this entry. Yesterday- yesterday's entry didn't review as much as I wanted it too, but it was as dumb as I wanted it to be. And if you can't one word in your title working, make sure the other one is. And that should be quick enough