Showing posts with label dumb reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dumb reviews. Show all posts

Mar 29, 2011

If You Go to: DumbReviews.com



With my sub-par Spanish, I can translate this through pictures:

-"Now You Can Buy a Zero Kilometer for an Absurd Small"

-Menor Postor= Smaller Postor

-"Simply by using your phone- you can purchase a smaller phone that you can pay with using installment plans that fluctuate randomly. This insures that you really did fall for whatever the fuck we're selling (eco-phones? cars for homeless people to live in?). Lord Joseph Mary Mother of Heaven Bless our endeavor, as we have endeavied those who bless us. Amen. Amirite.



DumbReviews.com--- big enough to get our domain stolen by poor people.

Jul 26, 2010

Review: This on Facebook


Yeah, you're probably reading this on Facebook. That's a good thing. That you're even reading this is a GOOD THING. But, this on Facebook looks like I'm just a plethora of notes. I am certain you are smart enough to realize this is a link to a blog, DumbReviews.blogspot.com, but am not confident enough with myself to not mention so.

So this mentions so and it gets it out of the way. Getting it out of the way is all I really wanted to do. And since I am, I might as well say that comments don't appear on the blog if you comment on Facebook- which isn't to discourage you from commenting, please do, but to say to you to comment on the blog in case you don't want to keep being notified if other people comment. See I'm helping. Really this entry serves no purpose in the long run, it'll just remind me that I link to it on Facebook and was concerned about that linking for a minute there. Also, I put in a picture of one of those wolf boys trying to be normal. He almost has it down. Aside from all the hair growing out of his face.

Feb 12, 2010

Reviewin': a review about a review about a review about a review

The picture by now! Get it? I do. The review yesterday came from the heart. So did the day before that which that addressed in the review yesterday. But there are different ends to different hearts. There is a space between those two ends where you should slide yourself into and hammer your shoes in with comical nails and sound effects. A review is what you think about something in a voice your comfortable saying something in. That is what we were trying to achieve here. To learn something about yourself. While part of you can be proud, part of you can be disappointed and other parts can think what they will what those parts think. There is no rule on how to think, therefore there is really no rule on how to review, other than to simply review. You went over this- it wasn't deep, you went over that- it tried to be deep. That's what it was then. I can say that because I can review that. It's simple and it shed's its meta-coat. The balance of voice can do that. If you would like to know my personal struggle, it was within being nice, being reasonable, wanting to be mean, and not caring. There is something to take out of each of those. I'm just writing it down so to not forget to take something from each of those. I am capable of experiencing more than one emotion at a time. Because not allowing myself to grow into other feelings and thoughts, isn't growing up. And goodness knows I have some growing up to do. And Gladys knows I have some throwing up to poo. It's called diarrhea and I've been taking Kirkland Signature's Loperamide Hydrochloride which is really a name I wish I made up. To find such stagnant nature in medical terminology as to create a fake name believed to be real is a goal considered set. But I digress. Reviewing a review about a review about etc. for however long I did it was an exercise in where can I go with something that challenging, the result wasn't that far. The high road taken would've been dissecting each review line by line, and then doing that again so that the review you are dissecting line by line is a review you dissected line by line. But you're not as good as Fire Joe Morgan. At least you know you want to be as good as them. At least you know when to stop? Eh sure.

Feb 11, 2010

Reviewing: Yesterday's Post on the review of the other day's post which in turn was a review of that post itself

The purpose of meaning or Meaning of the purpose. That line and what it divides should never be clear to me. Because that's just a fluffy way of starting my review to being able to get away with saying things are fluffy when that doesn't describe anything. Is this a parody of myself? Is that a rhetorical question? In reviewing the reviews of the reviews, I say I am lacking a voice. To find that voice and to make it consistent seems to be a strategy to make the whole process of these, mind the intention, dumb reviews work. But no, it is myself. Don't back down from yourself, myself. You're great, me. I'm proud of I. You just needed to say that. Sure it was a ploy, but hey you got a day's worth of entry out of it. And even though you seemed worried- it was a job well done review! You actually reviewed something there and you didn't even have to re-read it which you should always do to check for errors in continuity in continuity and grammar. Faking being professional will take you a lot of places, and sure addressing the issue of confidence doesn't make it go away, it just doesn't make it pretend anymore. So now that you have real issues, welcome to the real world. There is a lot more uses for towels and you should be thankful they come in so many sizes. Except beach towels. Those are gimmicks. The trick there is to find a worthwhile beach. Which those don't exist. It's all sand and making sure the person you're staring at doesn't know you're staring at them and references to TV Show episodes where they themselves go to the beach (rugrats HOLLA). Now, be a sport, go fetch me some 'life worth living', I got a good feeling about you yet, me.

Feb 10, 2010

Reviewing: Yesterday's review of the review of the day before that

We must understand that through these reviews, we can see how the author thinks of his audience. A short entry? C'mon I'vebeen better than that and it makes it seem like I don't enjoying talking/blogging. The real issue here is commitment. The more real issue hiding behind that mask of commitment is my own stuggles on how to talk to others. What do I want the reader to care about? I don't care. See! That's the problem. Sure, I am writing this for myself but to what extent? I already made this more reader friendly-- didn't I? The struggle is to look at yourself and truly allow yourself to be honest. You are kind of doing that. But that is still a kind of. Choose a side. No one needs to know anything about your long term goals, or anything about yourself. They just are here to read a blog entry. And this one isn't doing it as much as you would hope. But then again, it might be more than you hoped- sure it's a concept, and damned if you're struggling with it. Just keep pushing through. Spinning the wheel is what makes it mostly a wheel. Just don't too wrapped up in yourself. Yesterday's review was a slow ride, take it easy. There was no passion and no concern for yourself. Just an entry to be done. And that's a cop out. Don't pussy foot around, take things seriously. There are ways to be happy and it starts with me being serious about these entrys that aren't supposed to be serious. I'll enjoy it more. And quit confusing yourself and everyone else by changing tenses. That is really annoying. I know you were doing it on purpose to us. It's just that this is a review of another review about a review. You're going to lose your place. Now go out there, this entry is a stepping stone. Use it as light and the path shall be shown unto you. Hurry! This is the day.

Feb 9, 2010

Reviewing: Yesterday's Post

The thought process was there, but there weren't as many wheels turning as one would like. It was of the moment, sure- but didn't discuss much. This entry should discuss much more simply because it has that much more retrospect. 'A day more of retrospect' sounds like a decent high school band that won't ever materialize to anything. So basically- that entry tried. Which is what I got from re-reading it, you re-retard. Still, there needs to be more time with it. There is a point to make that if the posts continue like this- that first entry becomes the center of the onion behind the layers- but this isn't about the future of the entries (it actually is), but about yesterday's entry- which depends on the future (see?). So do I end this entry quick? It's not about this entry. Yesterday- yesterday's entry didn't review as much as I wanted it too, but it was as dumb as I wanted it to be. And if you can't one word in your title working, make sure the other one is. And that should be quick enough

Feb 8, 2010

Reviewing: This Post

Alright. What do we say to something when we're saying it already? We say it normal. Not louder. No, never louder. Well this post is about this post and how much this post will effect the following: future posts, current posts, and arguably, past posts (right in there, right in that context). This post is a way for me to express feelings about what I am writing right now. Which, to me, isn't half bad. Pretty good so far. In time, maybe I'll grow to love this post, maybe put it in a best of collection. But they don't have those. In reviewing this post, I have to look at the circumstances of the day and usually, my feelings on any post coincide with my feelings of that day. So maybe this is a worser post than I thought because I am having a good day? Maybe this is a great post, full of bemusement. But I didn't do any word play or say anything ridiculous or silly or even fun... but this post isn't about what I come to expect of myself or hypothesizing what this post is. This post is about this post. And I'll let it stand on its leg. Post legs. Christopher Reeves. Ha. Anyway, I, right now, am amused by this post. Only because it was easy enough to write. Stream the conscious, don't you know? Humbling itself is the only way to humble myself. Humble probably isn't the best word to use here, but you didn't write it, and you don't have to deal with me.

Jan 29, 2010

A review of what I'm going to do on this blog in the future

This is not a review of a better tomorrow. This is a review of what will be. I'm going to try something. This review is telling you what it is and reviewing what it is- and it is something I am trying. It could take its toll, but they will be reviews. And how much toll do reviews take? You disagree with it, disagree with it, or just notice it. I don't mean to be neutral, but this is in the future. It's an undertaking. Also this is a pre- of it and maybe having this already starts it. But this isn't it. This is a review of it before it ever happens. It's not happening next week. No. Probably the week after that. Don't hold any words to that. But I'm going to predict, just what it will be, will be, just what it is. Someone is going to think its stupid, someone is going to think its stupid after awhile. Hopefully, some will think the opposite. Most won't care. Me? I'm looking forward to it, which is the best part.